On Nov 21, 2007 9:16 AM, Flavio Junior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John, thanks for comments.. > > But this happens even with full backups. > I just post a Differential backup because this have all needed info > without a change tape needed. > > Below I post data about a Full backup: > > 20-Nov 02:02 bloo-dir JobId 675: Start Backup JobId 675, > Job=BackupImagens.2007-11-20_00.10.04 > 20-Nov 02:02 bloo-dir JobId 675: Using Device "LTO-1" > 20-Nov 02:02 bloo-sd JobId 675: Spooling data ... > 20-Nov 04:08 bloo-sd JobId 675: User specified spool size reached. > 20-Nov 04:08 bloo-sd JobId 675: Writing spooled data to Volume. > Despooling 100,000,003,260 bytes ... > 20-Nov 08:35 bloo-sd JobId 675: Despooling elapsed time = 04:26:08, > Transfer rate = 6.262 M bytes/second I am concerned about this number as it should be much higher. This number represents the speed at which the bacula-sd is writing to tape from the spool file. On a LTO2 archive I get 35 to 45MB/s. For LTO1 you should get 1/2 of this as the drive writes at roughly 1/2 the speed of LTO2. Is your cpu under full load while spooling? Does the hard disk thrash a lot while spooling? Are you spooling over a 100Mbit network? What is your spool size?
John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
