Dan Langille wrote: > Erik P. Olsen wrote: >> Dan Langille wrote: >>> Erik P. Olsen wrote: >>>> I have just installed bacula ver 2.2.8 on fedora 7 and have >>>> configured BAT using --enable-bat. I can find bat.conf in its proper >>>> place but I can't find any trace of the BAT program itself. It's not >>>> in the install directory and locate doesn't find it. >>> Did you refresh the locate database after your install? >> Yes. >>>> The configure program exits with return code 0, so everything ought >>>> to be correct except BAT is not there. >>>> >>>> Is this a bug or is there something I have overlooked that I should >>>> have done? >>> Have you tried find? >>> >> Yes. >> >> BTW, do you know if there is a "standalone" way of building BAT? > > You saw no errors? BAT is notoriously finicky to build. > I saw no errors. But I may have found why it didn't build. I took a closer look at qt4. It comes as a part of the fedora 7 install but looking for the qt4 libraries it reveales that both qt4 AND qt-3.3 are installed and moreover it's qt-3.3 which is made active. For example the variable QTDIR contains /usr/lib/qt-3.3 where bacula probably wants /usr/lib/qt4.
Well, what do I do? I could probably try again after export of QTDIR with the right value but do I really have to build the entire enchilada just to get BAT built? -- Erik. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
