On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Miguel E. Chang Peña <mcha...@facinf.uho.edu.cu> wrote: >> Have you created the bacula database? >> And then started it? > >> All I can say is this is a rather old version of bacula and it has a >> few known bugs but it is unlikely that you will hit them so this >> version is fine for now. >> >> John >> > > I have already created the bacula database and still does not work. It has > 21 tables, and I think that is not the problem. What worries me the most > is that "version error for database bacula. Wanted 9, got 10." Why is it > telling me that? I have checked the configuration file, but I see > everything is O.K. If you know something, please help me. Thank you a lot. >
How did you install the software? The reason I ask is that what this means is the catalog was created with a script from a newer version of bacula than the version of bacula that you are running. I believe 2.0.X installed a catalog version 10. You can not downgrade a catalog so this will not work on a system with 1.38.X installed. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
