>>>>> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:05:03 -0500, Brian McDonald said: > > On Tuesday 03 March 2009 3:50:31 pm Dan Langille wrote: > > Martin Simmons wrote: > > >>>>>> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:24:36 -0500, Dan Langille said: > > >> Folks: > > >> > > >> A patch has been proposed for the FreeBSD rc.d script. If you can test > > >> this and let me know if it works for you: > > >> > > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/132286 > > > > > > You may want to raise a new pr for this, but maybe the numbers 9101 etc > should > > > be set from @dir_port@ etc during configure like with > > > scripts/bacula-ctl-dir.in etc in the Bacula source code? > > > > That is a very good idea. > > > > I am not sure how to do that based on files/bacula-dir.in being outside > > the bacula source directory. > > You would probably need to reverse the source of 'truth' for the port > numbers. > The port's Makefile would have a BACULA_DIR_PORT= parameter which would then > be set in the .in startup scripts, and also applied to the configure > arguments as needed. Then, the configure process in the source files would > propogate that setting out to the rest of bacula as needed.
Yes, good point. There is currently no way to set the port numbers when building the FreeBSD port anyway. __Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
