On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 3:37 AM, John Drescher <dresche...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Andreas Schuldei > Concurrency will work great. I have been using it in the way I > described for 5 years with bacula. I mean with a small spool size and > several concurrent jobs. At one point I was doing this with a single > DLT-IV drive but now I have a 2 drive 24 slot LTO2 autochanger. It > works great for me with a small spool size. Basically each job works > to fill its 5GB spool and then these 5GB spools go to tape when they > are ready.
i would like to use something like that. i would be interested in how to change my "no concurrency - no spool - to disk" setup to be more like yours. my datavolume would be two orders of magnitude higher, but i dont think that would be a problem, would it? would that mean that the database be more in the 3Tbyte range, then? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
