On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Graham Keeling <gra...@equiinet.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 09:34:30PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: >> tonight i ran my very first concurrent backup and the backup time went >> down nicely. yay. >> >> when trying to restore something from the backup i got this: > ... >> Files Expected: 1 >> Files Restored: 0 > > Hello, > > I found a very serious bacula bug a few months ago that has only been fixed > properly recently (I believe that 2.4.0 would have been affected), to do with > overlapping jobs both trying to use a single volume at the same time. > > Did you have two jobs write to a single volume at the same time?
yes, most likely that happend. i do have less volumes after the concurrent backup compared to the sequential. but there was a way to work around that, wasnt there? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
