Hi folks, the recent talk here of a bug relating to concurrent writes to a single backup volume has made me a bit uneasy about one of our production bacula servers.
We have one system with two tape libraries (so no single volume is used by two backups at the same time), however the other system used a large RAID with single file volumes (about 400g each). Bacula version there is bacula-2.2.8, and I only configured concurrent backups to "2" a couple of weeks ago, so I can't really tell we're facing the same issue here as described earlier. Has anyone observed this bug in version 2.2.8, and what's the version considered "safe" at the moment to use with concurrent backup jobs? All the best & thanks in advance for your comments, Uwe -- uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net phone: [+49] 5242.91 - 4740, fax:-69 72 Hauptsitz: Avenwedder Str. 55, D-33311 Guetersloh, Germany Registergericht Guetersloh HRB 4196, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Horst Gosewehr NIONEX ist ein Unternehmen der DirectGroup Germany www.directgroupgermany.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
