On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Paul Binkley <paul.bink...@ois.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I hope someone can help. I have been using Bacula for a couple of months now > running 2.4 on the director and all client daemons, and 3.0 for the storage > daemon (my mistake). This has been working fine. The 3.0 file daemon isn't > compatible with the 2.4 director, so I need to downgrade. > > It seems to be much more trouble to upgrade all the clients and the > director, so downgrading the sd seems to be the best option. Does anyone > have experience with this? What kind of trouble will I be getting into? >
You did not say what OS your 3.0 client was on. Also a 3.0 director can talk to a 2.4.X client. At home I have this setup. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
