Scott Courtney wrote: >I'd like to suggest that the spec file created during this process >should be renamed from bacula.spec to bacula-5.0.0.spec, because in my >case I was trying to keep an existing Bacula 3.0.3 build intact.
That's not the way you're supposed to do things with rpm. There are a few things that you're not supposed to do in rpm which would be quite convenient - and several more that rpm does which would be better done in other ways. But this isn't the list to discuss that :-) Moray. "To err is human. To purr, feline" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
