> Hello,
>
> I'm a fairly new Bacula user (all daemons
running on same machine-Ubuntu804 and a FD on Windows XP Home client). I've
set up a Full backup of a drive on the client that ran on Saturday and have
an
incremental backup of the same fileset done on Monday. Having noticed that
the
file size was large for the two day's worth of data, I excluded the Windows
swap file from the fileset.
>
> Today's incremental however
wouldn't run. Bacula insisted on running a new full backup.
>
What did you do here? Did you let it run, or did you
cancel it? I assume you cancelled it... see below.
> I'm aware that this is because I have changed the fileset, but
read about an option (Ignore FileSet Changes = yes) that is supposed to
ignore
that fact and continue to perform incrementals. After adding this and
reloading the configuration, Bacula still won't perform an incremental
backup.
>
> Is there a reason why it still refuses to run an
incremental backup (I deleted the JobID for the failed promoted Full backup
with the delete JobIB command)?
>
> Have a try if restarting the
director helps.
>
> Reload should be enough, but recently I
noticed that 3.0.3 didn't recognize fileset option changes reliably after
reload.
>
> --
> TiN
I performed as restart (and a
separate start/stop) but it's the same.
I've tested it with a smaller
job and it seems to be the case that the IgnoreFileSetChanges option only
takes effect if present in the FileSet definition when the original Full
backup runs (adding it in afterwards doesn't make a difference).
Many
thanks for the reply though!
One thing that still came into my mind: did you
cancel the forced-full backup that had started after changing the fileset, when
you didn't want it to run as full backup again? If so, the reason probably is
that the previous full backup didn't complete succesfully (because it was
canceled). Then the behaviour isn't only because of the fileset change
anymore, but because of the non-succesful previous full backup, which requires
the next one to be forced to be a full one, whether there were fileset changes
or not. For more information about this, see the explanation under the "Level"
directive of the "Job Resource" in the documentation.
Btw, when asking this kind of questions in the future,
pls. tell which version of Bacula you have. I guess you have got it from some
Ubuntu repo, and maybe it wasn't the latest released Bacula. Then the Real
Gurus (not me) here might immediatedly be able to say "oh yes, that was a bug
that was fixed in x.y"
--
TiN
Hello,
Yes, apologies for not
specifying the version I'm using (5.0.0).
No worries, it's fixed
now. I edited the FileSetId field in the database for the Full and
Incremental backup jobs to the new one (it appears that when you make a
change to a fileset, a new record is created in the 'FileSet' table. It
must use this ID to tell whether or not a previous Full backup uses the
same fileset). I reran the job and it performed an incremental. Yay!
I
did delete the cancelled job before looking into the
IgnoreFileSetChanges option.
Many thanks for your help.
Graham
_________________________________________________________________
Send us your Hotmail stories and be featured in our newsletter
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
