On 03/16/10 11:09, John Drescher wrote:
> On 03/16/10 10:30, Rodrigo Fernandes wrote:
>> My backup server has the bacula version 2.4.4-1 installed via tar.gz in a
>> Red Hat Enterprise Server 5.4 x86_64
> 
> You should really upgrade to 5.0.1 if possible.

Yes, agreed.  Unfortunately, 5.0.1 is not yet readily available on all
platforms except by building from source.  I was looking at this the
other day to see whether it was feasible yet to upgrade all of my
machines, and finding that (for example) Debian and Ubuntu *still* have
no stable packages newer than 2.4.4-b1, although there are unstable
Bacula-5 .debs and Gentoo has nothing newer than 3.0.3 even in unstable.
 It seems to be an uphill struggle to keep all the various OS
distributions up to date on Bacula.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  ala...@caerllewys.net   ala...@metrocast.net   p...@co.ordinate.org
         Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to