On 03/24/10 05:56, Thomas Wakefield wrote:
> Phil-
> Your exactly right in what you are thinking. Your diagram is correct,
> the server has both connections. Both interfaces run on separate subnets.
>
> But right now, all the traffic runs over ethernet. Which i have proven
> with a netstat, only the ethernet shows any connections, no connections
> are done over infiniband.
In that case, I would believe that you have a routing problem, and the
route to the ethernet segment has been assigned a lower (better) routing
metric than the infiniband subnet. What is the output, on your Bacula
server, of 'netstat -rn'?
You *are* of course defining infiniband clients by their addresses on
the infiniband subnet, right?
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
