>>>>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:59:45 -0400, Paul Mather said: > > I would like to continue to use this volume for backups, as it is well under > the 5 GB maximum volume bytes set in the pool definition. Is this an > unrealistic expectation for a bscan-recovered catalogue, or is there some > simple way to get this volume recognised as appendable again? (Is the > expectation after bscan to start with a new volume?)
No, bscan doesn't set VolBytes accurately. You could try to modify the value using an SQL command. > Is Bacula expected to act gracefully in the face of the loss/corruption of > the catalogue? Yes, but the recommended way to recover it is from a catalog backup. That doesn't help much for Sqlite -> PostgreSQL migration though, unless you can mungle the Sqlite dump to match what PostgreSQL needs. __Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users