> I'm trying to decide between bweb and webacula. I don't need a > logbook which is one of the main features of webacula. I'm looking > for a web ui that will ideally take the place of bat and give me user > friendly statuses and reports and mount/unmount/label volumes. A > blue sky option would be the ability to use bconsole. If there's a > better option than bweb or webacula, let me know. Thanks. > > -Marc
Hi, I use both and webmin (and bat and bconsole but seldom). I get all the "normal" stuff done with webmin and the information bweb provides is quite fair. Apart from that webmin and bweb are easy to install. webacula was a hassle and in the end it offers not that much. Cheers, Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
