Il 10/03/2011 12:47, Martin Simmons ha scritto: >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:55:26 +0100, Marcello Romani said: >> >> searching the 'net for how to setup a one-tape-per-day schedule, I >> found in many places the suggestion to set the Volume Use Duration >> parameter to 23 hours. If I remember correctly, these are counted from >> the "last written" timestamp of the tape. >> So my question is: shouldn't this value take into account the time it >> takes for the backup to complete (otherwise subsequent backups are >> delayed until the previous day's tape becomes 'used') ? Is it correct to >> set it to something like 12 hours to remain on the safe side ? > > No, the Volume Use Duration is counted from the "first written" timestamp, so > the only delay is the time between the scheduled time and the start time of > the job. > > You were probably thinking of the Volume Retention, which /is/ counted from > the "last written" time. > > __Martin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Thank you Martin. -- Marcello Romani ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users