>>>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:35:15 -0400, Christian Tardif said: > > On 11/07/2011 14:34, Christian Tardif wrote: > > On 11/07/11 12:15 PM, Adrian Reyer wrote: > >> Never tried it myself, but I have seen some documentation yesterday > >> about labling tapes when needed by issuing 'unmount' first. Doesn't this > >> resolve your 'blocked' status? > >> -> > >> http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Brief_Tutorial.html#SECTION0016100000000000000000 > >> > >> Regards, > >> Adrian > > > > I'll give it a try tonight on a test environment but I think I've > > already tried that. > > > > I'll let you know. > > Nope, this is not working. The tape drive is just not reacting at all... > If this is a feature, this should be renamed as a bug, as there MUST be > a way to push a label function even when the device is BLOCKED, waiting > for a tape to be mounted or labelled. > > Luckily enough, I have the exact message I was talking about: > > 11-Jul 16:08 localhost-sd JobId 11321: Please mount Volume "LTO-E" or label a > new one for: > Job: fdld-E.2011-07-10_23.59.05_08 > Storage: "Ultrium-2" (/dev/nst2) > Pool: E > Media type: Ultrium2
Please post the output of running these commands in bconsole (with appropriate responses): unmount <<insert a blank tape into the drive>> label mount __Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
