>>>>> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:34:47 +0100, Graham Sparks said:
> It's a real shame that the pruning takes effect across pools. If it only > affected volumes in the same pool as the job, and didn't happen if the job > failed (I think the latter's the case anyway), that would be great for cases > where the client may not always be accessible. I think this is fixed in the development branch (for the next release). In 5.0.x, it prunes everything related to the client that was used in the job. __Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
