I added three new jobs, two new pools and one fileset. But I kept that one job as it was. I checked and noticed the last incremental backup failed due to an error of the autochanger. Could that be the reason? How does bacula determine what it has to do? I would have thought a failed job should just mean twice as much to save the next day.
Henrik Henrik Zawischa Senior System Engineer SONIC Performance Support GmbH Wandsbeker Königstraße 19 - D22041 Hamburg Tel.: +49 40 300 600 34 Fax: +49 40 300 600 18 E-Mail: henrik.zawis...@sonic-ps.de Web: www.sonic-performance-support.com Facebook: www.facebook.com/SONICVideoTraining YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/SONICVideoTraining Twitter: www.twitter.com/VideoTraining ________________________________________ Von: John Drescher [dresche...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. Mai 2012 18:03 Bis: Henrik Zawischa - SONIC Performance Support Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Last full backup not found > I have a strange phenomenon: though there is definitely a full backup, a > job set to incremental claims there weren’t and wants to run a full backup. > Very unfortunate, as the tapes needed are not in place. Any idea how I could > find out what went wrong? > Did you modify the job or fileset since the last full backup? John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
