On 04/06/12 17:06, Phil Stracchino wrote: > (No, I have not considered moving to Postgres. Honestly, Postgres > makes my teeth bleed.)
It's a lot easier than it looks - and as a nice bonus you don't need to spend ages tuning it. WRT the earlier comments about SSD data spooling: It's a BIG win if there are multiple simultaneous backups happening. Headseeks while spooling kill throughput and that's exactly what happens if there is more than one backup process accessing the area at once. SSD on the database won't make much difference to backup speeds simply because the only thing it's going to affect is attribute despooling and that's only a tiny fraction of the overall backup time. It's a huge win for anything manipulating the database and when making dumps. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
