2012/8/7 Uwe Schuerkamp <uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net>
>
>
> In a way, yes, but we're not happy with it because of the extremely
> long recycle times. Most of our backups run on the weekend, so as a
> consequence or volume for that day is rather big and I've begun moving
> large and / or long-running backups to their own pools / devices /
> storages. Still, recycling the volume takes around five hours, so if
> I'd have to start from scratch again, I'd set up separate pools
> etc. from the beginning. (volume size currently ranges from 500G to
> 1,4T).
>
>
> If anyone has any ideas how to reduce the volume size while increasing
> the number of volumes *without* having to constantly fiddle with the
> maximum volumes in the pool definition as clients get added and
> removed, I'm all ears.
>
five hours for recycling the volume? that seems a very long time.
I want to use single large volumes to backup because I need to rsync bacula
backup volumes to remote site. and I think a single large volume for every
job
(full,diff,inc every month,weekend,day) is better for rsync (it only need
to sync
different volumes after each job) .
if there are better structures to sync bacula volumes to remote
site,please let me know.
thanks a lot for suggestion!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
