On 5 October 2012 02:35, John Drescher <dresche...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Pubudu Perera <suharsha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> I'm a newbie to Bacula and want to verify whether my requirement can get >> done using bacula. >> I want to know whether it's possible to simultaneously make backups to >> local HDD and Amazon S3 from the same source in Bacula. >> >> Can someone please help me with this? >> Thanks in advance. > > I would backup to the local drive then mirror that with rsync to S3 > via s3fs fuse. > > John > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM > Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly > what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app > Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>From my experience using s3cmd is much more reliable than s3fs. There's a sync command in s3cmd that acts like rsync, it's probably more efficient with bandwidth as well. You could run s3cmd in a post job script and set the job to error if the s3cmd sync command fails. Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users