Hello,
I've set auto-labeling in my pool definition:
# Default pool definition
Pool {
Name = "Default"
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes # Bacula can automatically recycle
Volumes
AutoPrune = yes # Prune expired volumes
Volume Retention = 45 days # a month and a half
Maximum Volume Bytes = 25G # Limit Volume size to something
reasonable
Maximum Volumes = 16 # Limit number of Volumes in Pool
Volume Use Duration = 7d # Use a new tape every week
Recycle = yes # Recycling
Recycle Oldest Volume = yes # Recycle the oldest volume
LabelFormat = "jf-backup-tape-"
}
And I need to re-create my tapes due to a new backup strategy. But I notice
that the tape numbering scheme seems to pick up from where the last pool
left off:
Select the Pool (1-3): 3
+---------+---------------------+-----------+---------+----------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+
| MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes |
VolFiles | VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType |
LastWritten |
+---------+---------------------+-----------+---------+----------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+
| 207 | jf-backup-tape-0001 | Full | 1 | 26,843,542,493 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-03
03:48:23 |
| 208 | jf-backup-tape-0002 | Full | 1 | 26,843,507,914 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-03
05:11:43 |
| 209 | jf-backup-tape-0003 | Full | 1 | 26,843,507,914 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-03
06:27:53 |
| 210 | jf-backup-tape-0210 | Full | 1 | 26,843,493,191 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-04
02:19:26 |
| 211 | jf-backup-tape-0211 | Full | 1 | 26,843,502,243 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-04
03:50:07 |
| 212 | jf-backup-tape-0212 | Full | 1 | 26,843,507,914 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-04
05:15:09 |
| 213 | jf-backup-tape-0213 | Full | 1 | 26,843,507,914 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-04
06:31:47 |
| 214 | jf-backup-tape-0214 | Full | 1 | 26,843,529,199 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-05
02:32:19 |
| 215 | jf-backup-tape-0215 | Full | 1 | 26,843,530,749 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-05
03:57:34 |
| 216 | jf-backup-tape-0216 | Full | 1 | 26,843,507,914 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-05
05:22:34 |
| 217 | jf-backup-tape-0217 | Full | 1 | 26,843,507,914 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-05
06:39:16 |
| 218 | jf-backup-tape-0218 | Full | 1 | 26,843,484,949 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-06
02:37:38 |
| 219 | jf-backup-tape-0219 | Full | 1 | 26,843,507,429 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-06
03:58:47 |
| 220 | jf-backup-tape-0220 | Full | 1 | 26,843,507,914 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-06
05:37:46 |
| 221 | jf-backup-tape-0221 | Full | 1 | 26,843,507,914 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-06
06:54:03 |
| 222 | jf-backup-tape-0222 | Full | 1 | 26,843,496,040 |
6 | 3,888,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | File | 2013-01-07
02:48:34 |
+---------+---------------------+-----------+---------+----------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+
Is there any way (maybe by manipulating the database directly) to re-set
the tape numbering scheme so that I can have the tapes labeled 0001-0025?
Thanks
Tim
--
GPG me!!
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, SSIS, SSRS
and more. Get SQL Server skills now (including 2012) with LearnDevNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts.
SALE $99.99 this month only - learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122512
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users