>>>>> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 17:49:04 +0200, Laurent Papier said: > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:31:29 -0600 > Greg Woods <g...@gregandeva.net> wrote: > > > Last night I modified the FileSet for my main house server. I got the > > Windows version of Bacula running inside the Windows 7 virtual machine, > > so that I don't have to copy the entire 12GB virtual disk image on every > > incremental backup of the server, plus I get the ability to restore > > individual files. So what I changed in the FileSet was only to add an > > exclusion for the virtual disk image file. > > > > This resulted in the next incremental backup turning into a Full. Is > > that expected behavior? Does any modification of the FileSet invalidate > > all the previously-stored catalog entries for that client? > > > > Yes, this is the expected behaviour. If you don't want a Full backup after > modifying a fileset add: > Ignore FileSet Changes = yes > > in the fileset definition.
Be very careful when doing this after adding something to the fileset though, because you will get an incomplete backup (unless you are using the Accurate option). __Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
