Hello,

2014-05-15 13:27 GMT+02:00 Josh Fisher <jfis...@pvct.com>:

>  On 5/15/2014 1:26 AM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>  2014-05-13 13:26 GMT+02:00 Keith T <keithb...@yahoo.com>:
>
>>  Thanks all for your reply and informative document!
>>
>>  As stated on my previous message, I was using root to run bacula
>> services and assumed it has no privilege issue. But not sure whether I have
>> to run as bacula ID since I saw some suggested to do so?
>>
>>  root     14419     1  4 May08 ?        06:03:09 /sbin/bacula-sd -v -c
>> /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf
>> root     14440     1 25 May08 ?        1-07:39:19 /sbin/bacula-fd -v -c
>> /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf
>> root     14463     1  0 May08 ?        00:02:01 /sbin/bacula-dir -v -c
>> /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf
>>
>>  I wonder why the command prompted me to check "sg device" but not "sd
>> device" since I was connected a USB docking with dual slots.
>>
>>  Recap:
>>   #Bacula is running as root
>>  [root@backupsys bacula]# /etc/bacula/mtx-changer
>> /etc/bacula/usbchanger1.conf list
>> /etc/bacula/usbchanger1.conf is not an sg device, or old sg driver
>>
>>
>  In My Very Humble Opinion you are going in the wrong way!!! Stop before
> someone gets hurt. :)
>
>  First of all. Do you have a tape library or autochanger connected into
> your Bacula server? Could you show an output of the command (run as root):
> # lsscsi -g
>
>  If you do not have any tape library then please forget about mtx-changer
> script. It is for tape library/autochanger not disks.
> In this case (hard disk storage) you should use a very simple
> configuration, i.e. for two virtual devices:
>
>
> I agree, however he says he is using a two-slot USB disk device. It
> depends on whether or not this device is a RAID device that mounts at a
> single mountpoint or two separate physical devices that mount at two
> different mountpoints. The mentioned virtual autochanger config will work
> perfectly if the device is a RAID or JBOD device. However if the two drives
> are presented to the system as two different physical devices then it is
> more involved because there will be two different mountpoints.
>

We know nothing about his setup. You make some assumptions and I do too. We
can both are wrong or both can have right. :)

At one setup I have a two-slot USB disk device which is presented to the
system as two separate devices and I have only one single mountpoint. :)

best regards
-- 
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to