Hi all,

My current  configuration backs up to a NAS, and later though a migration job 
moves completed backups to tape for off-site storage.

That puts up a dilemma: copy, or move?

When I copy the backups to tape, I understand that only the original (NAS) 
version remains in the database, which would complicate things if ever a backup 
has to be restored from tape (find out which tape contains the files you are 
looking for, then scan that tape to get its catalog, etc.).

When I move (migrate) them to tape, the backups on NAS are deleted at that 
time. Tapes are stored off-site, so I have to get in my car and go get them 
before I can restore anything.

Isn't there a way to achieve a combination of both of these, so a copy would 
sort of "duplicate" the data in the database as well, and allow me to restore 
from the NAS or from tape, whichever is handy and available?

It would be even better (saving space on the NAS) if I could use different 
retention periods for both copies.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to