>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:44:51 -0400, Dan Ragle said: > > Think I'm missing something in my setup here, but don't know what. > > I'm running director and sd version 7.0.5 on a CentOS box, and backing > up (among others) a Windows Vista Home Premium client (which is running > 5.2.10). I'm finding that the incremental saves for the Windows client > ALWAYS include all the empty directories and zero-byte files, whether > they've changed or not. > > Looking at the bat/brestore console, I can see for example that a > certain zero-byte file is listed in every incremental backup, and that > it has the same date and Chksum in every entry. > > I'm using accurate mode backups, with accurate=pinsmc1: > > FileSet { > Name = Windows > Include { > Options { > compression=GZIP > signature=SHA1 > accurate=pinsmc1 > checkfilechanges=yes > } > ... > > with the includes and excludes pretty normal (a few * wildcards in the > excludes, but nothing fancy). I'm also backing up a few Linux clients > and a MacOS client with the same director and not noticing this behavior > with those (two of the linux clients are 7.0.5, and the other one as > well as the Mac client is 5.2.6). > > Anything obvious jumping out at anybody? I can provide more info if > needed, but figured I'd start with some basics.
You could try setting the debug level to 100 in the client (setdebug client=Windows level=100 trace=1) to see what it is comparing. You could also look at the lstat column for those files in the file table to see what differs (see .bvfs_decode_lstat at http://www.bacula.org/7.0.x-manuals/en/main/New_Features_in_7_0_0.html#SECTION003129000000000000000). __Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users