On 04/02/2015 01:03 PM, Bryn Hughes wrote: > I think you could achieve what you are trying to do by using two Changer > definitions. Put some of the drives in one 'Changer' and the other > drives in the other. Then have your Pool definitions use the changer > that contains the drives you want.
It sounded to me like the requirement was I have n drives and 3 pools, if there active jobs using pool2 or pool2 jobs that use pool1 may use any (n - 1) drives else jobs that use pool1 may use n drives My first stab would be to bump the priority of jobs using pool2 & 3 up and see how fast they finish. If it's fast enough maybe you don't even need to worry about reserving drives for pool1 jobs. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
