-----Original Message----- From: Matt Ivie <matt.i...@bonntran.com> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Bacula-users] SQLite Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:17:11 -0600 Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6+6.0trisquel1
I saw a note in the Bacula documentation stating that some users were reporting database corruption problems when using SQLite. I also saw a thread on the mailing list from a couple of years ago where one user wanted to know if he would be better off using Postgresql One user stated he had great luck using SQLite and another simply said he recommended Postgres. I don't want to run a full blown database if I don't need to as my backup needs are not really complicated. I would like to use SQLite but if stability is a problem I'll have to rethink the situation and go with MySQL or Postgres. Does anyone here have experience with using SQLite? _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users Is there anyone with any experience on this issue? For a little more background I'm going to be doing backups on machines with anywhere from 30GB to 230GB of storage used. I'm guessing that the more files that get put into the tables the more possibility for corruption? Any input on the topic is appreciated. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
