On 2016-01-05 at 12:12:26 Dan Langille wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Erik P. Olsen <epod...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 2016-01-05 at 15:01:11 Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > >> There is always the possibility of a bug in Bacula, but no one has > >> reported one. It "sounds" like you are saying that something is a > >> bug, but I am not sure. > >> > >> I based the Bacula algorithm on the ISO definition as it existed in > >> 2000, and I never remember seeing anything about a year being more > >> than 365 days. This is why I came with week 0. If I missed that or > >> the ISO definition has changed, that might be worthwhile reporting. > >> However, always take what some web site says is an ISO > >> implementation with a grain of salt. It takes a good amount of > >> time to ensure that an algorithm is correct. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Kern > > > > Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601 > > Keep in mind that wikipedia is a reference, not the ISO itself.
I do. But if you debate the correctness of this wikipedia reference you can verify it by buying the full standard from the ISO store: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store.htm -- Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
