Thanks for the confirmation that bacula-enterprise-win64-7.4.0 works for you :-)
On 02/26/2016 09:33 PM, Randy Katz wrote: > If it's any help I was running bacula-win64-5.2.10 until recently and > upgraded to bacula-enterprise-win64-7.4.0 without a hitch. Directors are > all running 7.4, were running each upgrade until 7.4 previously. > > On 2/26/2016 1:28 AM, Cejka Rudolf wrote: >> Kern Sibbald wrote (2016/02/26): >>> I have no idea what "developer's gift" is but to the best of my >>> knowledge no Windows 7.0.5 ever existed. >> Oops, I'm sorry I was so unclear. I have found the original >> status report: >> >> http://blog.bacula.org/bacula-status-report-30-august-2014/ >> >> Yes, it was not developers, but "friends" and you decided that it >> would be "contributors that are listed in the AUTHORS file". >> >> Please, was it meant as one particular version, which is 7.0.5, >> or as access to Bacula Windows binaries with upgrades, possibly >> with some delay? >> >> Thank you very much. >> >>> On 02/26/2016 08:49 AM, Cejka Rudolf wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> after Windows client upgrade from public 5.2.10 to developers' >>>> gift 7.0.5, I have noticed that incremental jobs started to be too >>>> big and too slow. Before upgrade with 5.2.10: >>>> >>>> Elapsed time: 4 hours 28 mins 43 secs >>>> FD Files Written: 180,897 >>>> FD Bytes Written: 18,411,348,578 (18.41 GB) >>>> >>>> After upgrade with 7.0.5: >>>> >>>> Elapsed time: 1 day 8 hours 31 mins 19 secs >>>> FD Files Written: 10,770,656 >>>> FD Bytes Written: 24,493,173,950 (24.49 GB) >>>> >>>> The difference is in ~ 10,000,000 entries. >>>> >>>> Full job has ~ 33,000,000 entries, where there are ~ 10,000,000 >>>> directories and ~ 23,000,000 files (strange itself). Job listing >>>> confirmed, that 7.0.5 Windows client includes all directory >>>> entries on the server in the incremental backup. Please, is there >>>> a configuration possibility to work around this problem? >>>> >>>> I have tried 7.4.0 for personal use also, and it works like 5.2.10, >>>> so maybe just 7.0.5 has this bug? Meantmime, I had to return to >>>> 5.2.10. >>>> >>>> Thank you. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
