> Having the same media type between the two changers actually produced a
> scenario
> wherein bacula became confused with slot numbers and pool inventory. If memory
> serves, it was Kern who suggested I use LTOa and LTOb as media types between
> the changers to avoid this contention.
Hello, Eddie: sorry by para shooting this. I think you must use at least two
different pools if you have the same media type for both autochangers (E,g,:
Daily-Changer1, Daily-Changer2 etc.), or different media types withing the same
pool.
> If however, I can mange a single set of pools/volumes/schedules across both
> changers, that would be ideal...
> Would this be a single bacula-sd with 2 storage resources, or 2 individual
> bacula-sd with a single storage resource each?
I think this just doesn't matter.
Regards,
===========================================================================
Heitor Medrado de Faria - LPIC-III | ITIL-F | Bacula Systems Certified
Administrator II
Do you need Bacula training? http://bacula.us/video-classes/
+55 61 8268-4220
Site: http://bacula.us FB: heitor.faria
===========================================================================
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785351&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
