Is anyone else running Bacula 9.0.6 on Gentoo Linux on the Gentoo 17.0 system-wide-PIE profile?
I just ran my first full backup to tape since migrating all my Gentoo boxes to the 17.0 profile, and every job took at least twice as long to run as the previous Full backup cycle, most taking three to five times as long and one taking 13 times as long. The only job not to see a significant slowdown was my Catalog backup. I have four clients running a total of six jobs, with a total backup size approximately 1.4TB to an LTO4 SAS tape drive. Generally it seems the fewer and larger the individual files in each job, the less it was impacted. The job that ran only 2x longer was the 1.3TB job that backs up the 12TB NAS (which, by the way, is not Gentoo; it's a Sun X4540 running Solaris 11.3). The OS backup itself for that host was five times slower despite no OS changes and its Bacula client not having been recompiled. The bottleneck APPEARS to me to be between the Storage and the tape drive, but I cannot be certain yet. I would be interested to know if anyone else who has just switched clients and/or servers to Gentoo 17.0 has experienced the same drastic drop in Bacula throughput. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications ph...@caerllewys.net p...@co.ordinate.org Landline: +1.603.293.8485 Mobile: +1.603.998.6958 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
