On 2018-04-05 10:25, Donna Hofmeister wrote:
Just to continue sniveling...I downloaded the *source* for bacula 7.4.7. While it compiled ok (I did have to install libacl-devel first), I'm pulling my hair out trying to get the service files created <sigh>.
FWIW I'm deploying more, or at least as many, new centos 6 installs, than centos 7 ones. I've come to the conclusion that between systemd with its service files and mount units and stuff, breaking kernel ABI on every point release, and lack of support for non-RedHat software (like bacula), el7 is not really a viable platform for mission-critical servers. It's merely tolerable for *some* deployments.
</rant> Dima --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
