Am 05.09.2018 um 17:16 schrieb Martin Simmons: >>>>>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 19:50:43 +0200, Sebastian Suchanek said: >> >> [...] >> The only thing that still puzzles me: When I just re-ran the aborted >> job, Bacula didn't ask for a tape that isn't in the changer, but didn't >> use the empty (and available) tape 1101 either. Instead, Bacula recycled >> the full volume 1103. (For further details, please see the output of >> "list media" in my previous e-mail.) >> Any ideas why *that* happened? > > It should prefer a volume with the Append status, so that is strange. Is the > Media.StorageID set correctly for tape 1101?
Yes, it should be. When I added the volumes to the pool with "label barcode" commands, something went wrong with some tapes (I can't remember what exactly), so tape 1101 was skipped at first and added later. Therefore, the order of the MediaID is not consistent with the order of the names of the volumes. Best regards Sebastian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
