> Thanks Phil Hello Hodges, > I guess this means I am correct about the AMD64 binary not working then
> Seems quite a process to get the source and compile it. I think it is probably > beyond me It is pretty doable: http://bacula.us/compilation/ Client build instructions at the end. There are not many deps or caveats. > Steve Regards, > On 22/01/2019 22:45, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> On 1/22/19 5:12 PM, Hodges wrote: >>> Been thinking about updating my bacula which is 5.2.6 and is running on >>> an oldish linux server which runs Debian 8 Jessie on an intel Atom i686 >>> processor >>> All the downloads on the website for 9.2.2 are for AMD64 so far as I can >>> see, which I guess will not work on my system. Am I right on this? Do I >>> have to change my server to run 9.2.2 >> You could always compile from source, if you have an unusual hardware >> platform. > -- > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- MSc Heitor Faria CEO Bacula LATAM mobile1: + 1 909 655-8971 mobile2: + 55 61 98268-4220 Brasilia - Miami - New York www.bacula.com.br
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
