Hello, I want to second this email, and thank Sven and the others for maintaining SQLite in Bacula. I will probably make one more release of 9.4.x which will have SQLite in it, but please note that the next version of Bacula will have a major change to the database catalog, and unless someone works *very* hard, SQLite will not be supported in that version. I will announce when the new database version is ready for testing, so that if the community would like to keep SQLite working, there should be sufficient time before the release. Aside from the work it takes to maintain the code, please be aware that if ever a SQLite database becomes corrupted, to the best of my knowledge there are no tools to correct it. For MySQL and Postgres there are tools that work quite well. Best regards, Kern On 4/29/19 9:16 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
On 29.04.19 20:57, Josip Deanovic wrote:It's not that SQLite is bad or does not have the needed capabilities but it simply adds to the complexity of the source and maintenance of bacula features.Also besides Carsten Leonhardt and me from Debian nobody has been testing or even maintaining the SQLite database scripts.SQLite is only available still because we tested and submitted patches to keep it working. Grüße, Sven. |
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users