On 25/07/19 03:52, Josip Deanovic wrote:
Can you also check ldd bacula-fd on both clients (working and not
working)?
I cannot check now if samba is using libacl or its own implementation.
client with working ACL backup/restore:
ldd /usr/sbin/bacula-fd
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffb519b000)
libesets_pac.so => /usr/lib/libesets_pac.so (0x00007f2deecfa000)
libacl.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libacl.so.1 (0x00007f2deea4b000)
liblzo2.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblzo2.so.2 (0x00007f2dee829000)
libbacfind-5.2.6.so => /usr/lib/bacula/libbacfind-5.2.6.so
(0x00007f2dee61b000)
libbacpy-5.2.6.so => /usr/lib/bacula/libbacpy-5.2.6.so
(0x00007f2dee417000)
libbaccfg-5.2.6.so => /usr/lib/bacula/libbaccfg-5.2.6.so
(0x00007f2dee20c000)
libbac-5.2.6.so => /usr/lib/bacula/libbac-5.2.6.so (0x00007f2dedfb1000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007f2dedd97000)
libpython2.7.so.1.0 =>
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0 (0x00007f2ded809000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
(0x00007f2ded5ec000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f2ded222000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f2ded01e000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f2deec53000)
libattr.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libattr.so.1 (0x00007f2dece19000)
libwrap.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwrap.so.0 (0x00007f2decc0f000)
libcap.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcap.so.2 (0x00007f2deca09000)
libssl.so.1.0.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0
(0x00007f2dec7a0000)
libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
(0x00007f2dec35c000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
(0x00007f2debfda000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f2debcd1000)
libutil.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libutil.so.1 (0x00007f2debace000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnsl.so.1 (0x00007f2deb8b5000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x00007f2deb69f000)
client with broken ACL backup/restore:
ldd /usr/sbin/bacula-fd
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff479ff000)
libacl.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libacl.so.1 (0x00007f584948c000)
libbacfind-5.2.6.so => /usr/lib/bacula/libbacfind-5.2.6.so
(0x00007f584927e000)
libbacpy-5.2.6.so => /usr/lib/bacula/libbacpy-5.2.6.so
(0x00007f5849079000)
libbaccfg-5.2.6.so => /usr/lib/bacula/libbaccfg-5.2.6.so
(0x00007f5848e6e000)
libbac-5.2.6.so => /usr/lib/bacula/libbac-5.2.6.so (0x00007f5848c13000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007f58489fb000)
libpython2.7.so.1.0 => /usr/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0
(0x00007f58484fb000)
libutil.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libutil.so.1 (0x00007f58482f8000)
librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007f58480ef000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
(0x00007f5847ed3000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f5847ccf000)
libwrap.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwrap.so.0 (0x00007f5847ac3000)
libssl.so.1.0.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0
(0x00007f5847864000)
libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
(0x00007f5847480000)
libcap.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcap.so.2 (0x00007f584727b000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
(0x00007f5846f74000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f5846cf2000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x00007f5846adb000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f5846751000)
libattr.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libattr.so.1 (0x00007f584654c000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f58496a9000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnsl.so.1 (0x00007f5846333000)
Missing ACLs in restores are not specific to samba.
I've tried it for other folders and the behavior was the same (i.e.
missing ACLs when restored).
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
