On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 01:37:26PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > On 25/07/19 13:15, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > > > no, I don't think so. If you run parallel Jobs the data will be interleaved > > on the tape, and a tape being a seq. access medium you are out of luck here. > How about if I set: > > Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 1 > > Then all jobs will be written on continuous tape segments. > > Just like separate tracks on old audio cassettes or movies on long VHS > tapes. > > I can imagine performance suffering significantly. > > In this case would it still be impossible to individually manage jobs data?
This still won't help in deleting a single job from the tape to "make room". I'm afraid that's not how tapes work :) All the best, Uwe -- Uwe Schürkamp | email: <uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net> _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
