I highly disagree with the RHEL 8 suggestion. You don't need to be fighting
new release problems with an OS on a backup server that will require frequent
patching and reboots.
As for Bacula community don't use the RHEL provided packages, they are way too
old.
Patti Clark
Sr. Linux System Administrator
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
On 8/16/19, 4:37 PM, "William Muriithi" <will...@perasotech.com> wrote:
Hello Maurizio,
If you are deploying on a new server, don't use RHEL 7. Use RHEL 8.
It will allow you to yum install a more recent Bacula-fd.
Alternatively, you avoid RedHat provided rpm and use upstream RPM instead.
Regards,
William
________________________________________
From: Maurizio Caloro <mau...@gmx.ch>
Sent: August 16, 2019 12:37 PM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] Bacula-FD - RedHat
Hello Together
Please i have here meny differnt older linux Server’s and the Backup Bacula
Server are running Version 5.2.5.
I know this are outdated. But i need to install Bacula-fd to this new Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo)
Please can are possible you can give me the possibilities so that i install
the FD Deamon to communication with Bacula 5.2.5 ?
On me envirement i have older Linux Version that dont support any newer
Bacula-FD Version.
Thanks and best regards
M
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
