On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 05:52:02PM +0100, Josip Deanovic wrote: > On Monday 2021-02-22 16:06:42 David Brodbeck wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 6:12 AM Josip Deanovic > > <djosip+n...@linuxpages.net> > > wrote: > > > It's interesting that the job had almost 2GB of attributes to > > > despool. That's quite a large amount of attributes. > > > > I have a few jobs that despool that much, and one that despools over 18 > > GB. The machine in question has 51 million files. > > Just to be sure... Are you talking about the attribute spool file that > gets created in running directory and not about the spool file that gets > created in the spool directory? >
I'd suspect he is talking about the attribute spool file. The size sounds about right (1,9GB on my end for around 5 million files, 19GB for his attribute spool with a tenfold amount of files in the backup job). I'm just wondering why David's job appears to be working fine without a modification of the attribute spool size parameter in catreq.c as outlined above... then again our job used to work for years without any issues, things only started to go wrong on bacula 9.6.5 or thereabouts. All the best, Uwe -- Uwe Schürkamp | email: <uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net> Arvato Systems S4M GmbH | Sitz Köln | Amtsgericht Köln HRB 27038 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
