It might be useful to see if /bin/touch can set these times orrectly on the restored file. That would clarify if it is a bug in Bacula.
__Martin >>>>> On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:30:21 +0100, Uwe Schuerkamp said: > > Hi folks, > > I'm not sure if this is a bug or a feature, but here goes (bacula 11 > compiled from source on CentOS Linux): > > Restoring a couple of test files from an "accurate" backup of a > windows share onto a different samba / cifs share (windows server OS) > fails to restore the access, modified etc. timestamps on the restored > files. This might have to do with the way the FS is handled by > windows, but I'd just like to ensure that bacula can handle these > cases correctly. > > Original files (also located on a windows share and backed up by a > Linux bacula instance): > > # stat 2097188.pdf > File: `2097188.pdf' > Size: 85428 Blocks: 168 IO Block: 16384 regular file > Device: 14h/20d Inode: 5977612 Links: 1 > Access: (0555/-r-xr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) > Access: 2025-12-31 00:00:00.000000000 +0100 > Modify: 2017-05-14 15:40:46.137837000 +0200 > Change: 2017-09-16 01:04:56.000000000 +0200 > > Restored file: > > # stat /mnt/netapp/restore_test/2097188.pdf > File: `/mnt/netapp/restore_test/2097188.pdf' > Size: 85428 Blocks: 168 IO Block: 16384 regular file > Device: 15h/21d Inode: 5977446 Links: 1 > Access: (0555/-r-xr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) > Access: 2021-11-02 12:07:57.000000000 +0100 > Modify: 2021-11-02 12:08:09.029652000 +0100 > Change: 2021-11-02 12:07:56.000000000 +0100 > > Thanks in advance & all the best, > > Uwe > > -- > Uwe Schürkamp | email: <uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net> > > > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
