Awesome, that was easy and worked perfectly.
Thank you so much!

> On 21. Feb 2023, at 18:44, Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users 
> <bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> 
> On 2/21/23 10:03, Justin Case wrote:
>> I have now implemented the retention period settings as described in my last 
>> email.
>> I am aware that the actual volumes do still have the old volume retention 
>> period “baked in”.
>> Question: At what point in the life cycle of a volume is the volume 
>> retention period updated in the volume itself to the current setting in its 
>> pool?
> 
> Hello Justin,
> 
> The volume retention `volretention` gets set/updated when a volume is created 
> in a pool, or when the volume enters a pool.
> 
> For the latter action, an example would be if you use the `ScratchPool` 
> and/or `RecyclePool` settings in a pool. When Bacula pulls a volume from the 
> defined Scratch pool and moves it to the backup pool, the volume will inherit 
> the pool's `Volume Retention` setting - among other things.
> 
> If the volume has the old retention, and never leaves the pool, (without 
> testing this) I am pretty confident that it will never get the new Volume 
> Retention setting.
> 
> This is why you need to run the `update volume fromallpools` command when you 
> make these types of changes to a pool.
> 
> P.S. I always use the `fromallpools` option there since it does not hurt 
> anything and is easy for me to remember. :)
> 
> 
> Hope this helps,
> Bill
> 
> -- 
> Bill Arlofski
> w...@protonmail.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users



_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to