Hi Dan,
Am 06.05.2026 um 17:14 schrieb Stieneke, Dan - OCIO-CEC, ID via
Bacula-users:
Sorry all if this is a repeat, the original message was kicked back
stating it needs moderator approval because I’m a non-member (sending
address was new v. address which joined the list).
we'll see if we get another instance :-)
Without really looking through all the details, I wonder about a few
things in your job report.
In the progress report at the top, it mentions the SD wrote to three
volumes.
Eventual volume status is only mentioning two volumes, and the SD bytes
written is also 0.
This seems to indicate a problem that is not just a network issue
between FD and SD but rather something affecting the SDs capability to
communicate to the DIR as well.
If you run backups from other hosts, for example the backup server
itself, do those succeed?
Also, the report states that the FD believes it runs on Windows Server
2012, and that the FD version is slightly newer than the DIR/SD. None of
that is necessarily problematic, but I think it would be reasonable to
try upgrading the Bacula software on both ends first. Have you installed
DIR/SD from Ubuntu repos or from another source?
Then, the fact that the FD reports a network issue but the SD doesn't
seem to have anything to mention but the DIR lost the connection to it
would imply that, if there's a network or Bacula protocol problem, it
should be something that may be detected on the SD end. Have you ever
used debug tracing with Bacula?
Cheers,
Arno
--
Arno Lehmann
IT-Service Lehmann
Sandstr. 6, 49080 Osnabrück
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
