Gilberto,

At 08:30 PM 1/17/2005, you wrote:
>>Yes, I understand that. But that would only be an issue if the Bahai lamp is 
>>the only one with light. If light shone through muiltiple lamps, you can pick 
>>any lamp you want, even if for silly reasons like it was the lamp you grew up 
>>with, or it was the lamp your in-laws wanted you to use, because they all 
>>have light.<<

That viewpoint would certainly agree with most approaches to the perennial 
philosophy I have read. However, it would not, to my understanding, agree with 
the Baha'i principle of progressive Revelation and the Covenant (the Will of 
God). 

`Abdu'l-Baha said that people could benefit, today, from following the 
teachings of Christ. However, the Will of God, He believed, was for people to 
accept Baha'u'llah. 

If one rejects Baha'u'llah as the latest Prophet of God, because of an 
attachment to the verses revealed by a particular Lamp (a previous Prophet), 
then, by `Abdu'l-Baha's criterion, one is rejecting the Light (the Will of God) 

>>That reminds me of the parable of the grapes. They are all talking about the 
>>same thing, but with different names. The moral is that the names don't 
>>matter.<<

Again, that is one reason why I find such approaches to the philosophia 
perennis to be so problematic. The names *do* matter if they are pointing to 
God's Will. 

With regards, Mark A. Foster � 15 Sites: http://markfoster.net
"Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger" -- Abbie Hoffman 


__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[email protected]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to