|
In a message dated 1/24/2005 8:53:18 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
History You are actually missing several factions before these. They did not prosper either. Mason Remey pulled away how many Baha`i's of the time? probably less than 200.
This is a splinter of the Remey faction. One cannot say a faction has prospered if it breaks into smaller less tiny factions over time. Jensen is the result of one of the senescent Remey's appointments as Guardian. It too has gotten smaller over time. That is not a quality of prosperity.
As you point out itis defunct. Defunct is not a quality of prosperity.
Again a tiny splinter from the Remey dead branch, this does not constitute prosperity either.
I know of them. Again single communities of a small number does not constitute prosperity.
I doubt he has fifty active followers around the world. How is this prosperity? Is it not just another splinter from the Remey dead branch?
I am quite aware of the current history of covenant breakers. There are more whom you have missed, present and past. None of these have prospered. There are moree than six million Baha`i's around the world, 99.99% follow the Baha`i Faith and recognize the authority of the House.
Would you like an outline of the history of covenant breakers you have missed?
__________________________________________________ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[email protected] To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:[email protected] Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] |
- Re: punishment of crimes - was arson. Popeyesays
- Re: punishment of crimes - was arson. louise mchenry
- Re: punishment of crimes - was arson. Gilberto Simpson
- Re: punishment of crimes - was arson. Gilberto Simpson
- Re: punishment of crimes - was arson. Gilberto Simpson
- Re: punishment of crimes - was arson. Mark A. Foster
- Re: punishment of crimes - was arson. Popeyesays
- Re: punishment of crimes - was arson. Popeyesays
- Re: punishment of crimes - was arson. Gilberto Simpson
- Re: punishment of crimes - was arson. Mark A. Foster
- Re: punishment of crimes - was arson. Mark A. Foster
