On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:29:09 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 1/26/2005 7:25:27 PM Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I don't think you should talk to me like that. This is part of why I > would rather use a more neutral example. I have absolutely no interest > in marrying a nine-year old girl and as I said in my answer, I have no > objections to the statutory rape laws and I'm not interested in > repealing them. > No one thinks you are, Could have fooled me. > we are discussing the social laws of marriage and > coming of age. No. That wasn't even the original point. The original point was how do you evaluate prophets and think about sinlessness. I would say that there is a certain minimal core morality which is more fundamental and you could in principle use that the judge prophets. Mark seemed to say it was reversed and that within their dispensation prophets could do anything and almost by definition it would be correct. That was the original issue before people got side-tracked. Peace Gilberto "My people are hydroponic" __________________________________________________ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[email protected] To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:[email protected] Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
