On 10/12/05, Susan Maneck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "From what I gathered Susan *was* actually saying that because this
> happened with the New Testament (Pauline) it did imply that Pauline
> Christianity had a certain kind of approval which the other kinds did not
> have."
>
> Dear Gilberto,
>
> I didn't make any statement regarding the NT being "Pauline."
>

Sure, Pauline was a term I used. And it's just a rough label. James
epistle doesn't exactly fit in, for example. But Paul's words make up
more of the New Testament than anyone else's (even Jesus).  And there
were certainly other Gospels, epistles, and acts in existence which
promoted different theologies.

Peace

Gilberto


 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__________________________________________________
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[email protected]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[email protected]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to