> Gilberto:
> I see where you are coming from. But I would still label the Muslim
> interpretation of what Muhammad taught as "Islamic principles". The
> Bahai interpretation of what Muhammad (or the Bab or Bahaullah etc.)
> taught would be "Bahai principles". So in that sense Bahais are
> critical of "Islamic principles" (e.g. the idea that the Islamic
> shariah is still valid, the idea that Muhammad (saaws) is the last
> prophet, etc.)
> Hajir:
> Do you mean that the Baha'i view of "Islam principles" is essentially
> different from the Muslim view of "Christian principles"?
Gilberto:
Why would they be the same?
Hajir:
In other words, do you mean that Muslims are not critical of "Christian Principles"? Or said another way, do you also ciriticize Muslims for being critical of Christian Principles?
-------- -------- --------
Hajir:
Do you mean that
> Muslims do not misinterpret Christian "principles" because they are
> corrupt anyway?
Gilberto:
I don't know where you are getting this from exactly. I would just say
that when I explain my own view or a Muslim view on what Jesus taught,
I generally wouldn't try to pass them off as "Christianity".
Hajir:By saying this, are you saying that Baha'is try to pass off their view of Muhammad and the Qur'an as "Islamic"?
Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
