I could certainly be off track here, as I do not claim to be a historian or philosopher. But, if we disagree with 'Abdu'l-Baha about a philosophical movement, aren't we just pitting our opinions against His? This is not the same as comparing a statement of the Master about some aspect of science that might be well understood differently today. In part because of the seeming modernity of many Enlightenment ideas (as well as the connection to our founding fathers), is it not possible we over-idealize them, just as the French are attached to Voltaire and Napoleon?

I was thinking of how a revered figure Thomas Jefferson showed such brilliance and insight in what he *wrote*, but has come to be seen by many scholars as quite duplicitous and hypocritical in not only his dealing with slavery but in his dealings with those who thought he was his friends. Witness his apparent long-term backstabbing of John Adams, tho' Adams forgave him later. I'm not saying that this made Jefferson different from other politicians; just that his deeds showed him to be a different man than the author of the Declaration of Independence might lead us to believe. Without wishing to go into a lot of research to find examples to post here, I have seen both Christian conservatives and liberal atheists quote Jefferson and others to support their positions. 'Abdu'l-Baha may have sensed that there is less than meets the eye to many ideas that claim to be supportive of religion in some idealized sense, but not in practice. Again, He may be misled by prevailing Arab ideas, or He may be cutting to the heart of a matter that characterizes the movement in a way that we just don't like. But that, too, is just my opinion, so who can say?

Jeanine

M Chase wrote:
Abdul-Baha bashes Enlightenment philosophers like the rest of his contemporaries. The Enlightenment and those associated with it, when studied in detail and as individuals, reveal a much greater diversity of thought and cannot all be reduced to the simplistic stereotype of glorifying nature and reason at the expense of religion. Rejection of corrupt clerical influence and power is not the same thing as the complete rejection of religion. Not only was this lost on Abdul-Baha, but it was lost on the majority of Arab commentators who were contemporaries of Abdul-Baha. The most convincing evidence of this is provided by Arab historians who have written on the history of the Near Eastern reception and response to the introduction of European ideas and culture. Many Arabs simply equated secularism and science with materialism and atheism. Perhaps poor translations played a role, but there was outright misinformation and misinterpretation as well. This was certainly the case with the early Arab discussions surrounding evolution, which again mirror in many respects Abdul-Baha's own comments. I have a list of sources for the paper I am working on if you are interested. Marleen

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Dear Marleen,
I've studied the Enlightenment in some depth and I have to say my perception of it is closer to Abdu'l-Baha's than yours. I think it did glorify nature and human reason at the expense of religion. There were some good reasons for them to do this, but I don't think that fact was lost on Abdu'l-Baha. I have a bigger problem with the way that Abdu'l-Baha presents the Reformation in that same book. But Khazeh has suggested this may be the result of a mistranslations. The same may be true of those passages dealing with the Enlightenment.
warmest, Susan



The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.





The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__________________________________________________




You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[email protected]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[email protected]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[email protected]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[email protected]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to