What does any of this have to do with anti-intellectualism?

On 11/2/07, Richard H. Gravelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Friends:
>
> Following is an excerpt from Wikipedia's discussion of "deconstruction".  I
> post it because "Century of Light" mentions that:  "Against the background
> of this desolate landscape the intellectual vogue of the age, seeking to
> make a virtue out of grim necessity, has adopted for itself the appellation
> and mission of "deconstructionism". (Commissioned by The Universal House of
> Justice, Century of Light, p. 131)
>
> "It is easier to explain what deconstruction is not than what it is.
> According to Derrida, deconstruction is not an analysis, nor a critique, a
> method, an act, or an operation (Derrida, 1985, p. 3). Further,
> deconstruction is not, properly speaking, a synonym for "destruction".
> Rather, according to Barbara Johnson (1981), it is a specific kind of
> analytical "reading":
>
>      " "Deconstruction is in fact much closer to the original meaning of
> the word 'analysis' itself, which etymologically means "to undo" - a virtual
> synonym for "to de-construct." ... If anything is destroyed in a
> deconstructive reading, it is not the text, but the claim to unequivocal
> domination of one mode of signifying over another. A deconstructive reading
> is a reading which analyzes the specificity of a text's critical difference
> from itself."
>      --From Wikipedia
>
>      If Wikipedia's definition is in any way accurate; I can understand why
> some "intellectuals" would become somewhat sensitive to the slightest hint
> of "anti-intellectualism"
>
>      Richard.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto 
> ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is 
> intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity 
> named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy 
> and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is 
> not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, 
> distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply 
> and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any 
> attachments thereto. Thank you.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
>
>
> You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
> Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
> Mail - mailto:[email protected]
> Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
> News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
> Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
> Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>

__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[email protected]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to